Obstetric imaging practice characteristics associated with prenatal detection of critical congenital heart disease in a rural US region over 20 years.

OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical practice characteristics associated with the frequency of prenatal critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) detection (i.e., the number of liveborn infants with postnatally confirmed CCHD identified on prenatal sonography) over 20 years in a rural setting comprised of 11 primarily low-volume obstetric hospitals and the single tertiary academic hospital to which they refer. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients in the referral region with an initial prenatal and/or postnatal diagnosis of CCHD from 01/01/2002 to 12/31/2021. The frequency of prenatal CCHD detection at the time of an obstetric ultrasound was reported, as was the change in detection over time. Critical congenital heart disease detection was assessed as a function of cardiac lesion type, practice setting, and practice characteristics. RESULTS: There were 271 cases with a confirmed postnatal CCHD diagnosis, of which 49% were identified prenatally. The majority of community practices each averaged <10 CCHD cases in total over the study period. Prenatal detection at the tertiary academic hospital's obstetric ultrasound unit was 64%, compared to 22% at the combined referring community practices (p < 0.001), though CCHD detection improved over time in both settings. Professional accreditation by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, image interpretation by radiology or Maternal Fetal Medicine, and use of video clips of ventricular outflow tracts were associated with improved prenatal CCHD detection. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate the infrequency of CCHD cases at small-volume, rural hospitals and the substantial variation in prenatal CCHD detection across practice settings. Our methods allowed for the identification of practice characteristics associated with prenatal CCHD detection.

Medication for Addiction Treatment and Postpartum Health Care Utilization Among Pregnant Persons With Opioid Use Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate treatment and postpartum health care utilization among pregnant persons with opioid use disorder (OUD) in Vermont and Maine. METHODS: Vermont's and Maine's All Payer Claims Databases were used to identify deliveries 2010 to 2018 that were paid for, in part, by Medicaid. OUD was identified among pregnant persons if they had any claim with an OUD-diagnosis code (ICD-9/10) or medication for addiction treatment (MAT) code during the 5 months before delivery event. Consistent and inconsistent MAT were compared to no MAT on the rate of hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits in the first 12 months' postpartum using negative binomial regression. RESULTS: From 2010 through 2018, 27,652 deliveries in Vermont and 43,480 deliveries in Maine were among persons insured by Medicaid. The prevalence of OUD among pregnant persons increased from 6.7% to 11.6% in Vermont and from 7.4% to 11.0% in Maine. Among pregnant persons with OUD in 2018, 57% had consistent MAT in Vermont and 50% had consistent MAT in Maine; approximately 32% and 27% were not in treatment in Vermont and Maine, respectively. In Maine, consistent MAT was associated with a 47% lower rate of hospitalization and 37% to 46% lower rates of ED visits when compared to those without MAT; in Vermont, those with consistent buprenorphine treatment had a 30% lower rate of ED visits. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid data from Vermont and Maine suggests that medication for addiction treatment for opioid use disorder during pregnancy reduces emergency health care utilization in the first year postpartum.

Opioid use disorder treatment in rural settings: The primary care perspective.

Despite the efficacy of medications for treating opioid use disorder (OUD), they are underutilized, especially in rural areas. Our objectives were to determine the association between primary care practitioners (PCPs) rurality and concerns for patient substance use, and to identify factors associated with PCP comfort treating OUD, focusing on barriers to treatment. We developed a web-based survey completed by 116 adult-serving PCPs located in Vermont's rural and non-rural counties between April-August 2020. The instrument included PCP-identified concerns for substance use among patients, barriers to treating patients with OUD, and current level of comfort treating patients with OUD. On a scale from 0 to 10, rural PCPs reported higher concern for heroin (mean difference; Mdiff = 1.38, 95% CI: 0.13 to 2.63), fentanyl (Mdiff = 1.52, 95% CI: 0.29 to 2.74), and methamphetamine (Mdiff = 1.61, 95% CI: 0.33 to 2.90) use among patients compared to non-rural PCPs, and practitioners in both settings expressed high concern regarding their patients' use of tobacco (7.6 out of 10) and alcohol (7.0 out of 10). There was no difference in reported comfort in treating patients with OUD among rural vs. non-rural PCPs (Mdiff = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.17 to 1.46; P = 0.119), controlling for higher comfort among male PCPs and those waivered to prescribe buprenorphine (Ps < 0.05). Lack of training/experience and medication diversion were PCP-identified barriers associated with less comfort treating OUD patients, while time constraints was associated with more comfort (Ps < 0.05). Taken together, these data highlight important areas for dissemination of evidence-based training, support, and resources to expand OUD treatment capacity in rural communities.

Treating perinatal opioid use disorder in rural settings: Challenges and opportunities.

Perinatal opioid use disorder (OUD) is a life-threatening condition that significantly impacts women in rural areas. Medication assisted treatment (MAT) is the recommended treatment but can be difficult to access. Pregnant women may initially present for treatment of OUD in the emergency department, on labor and delivery units, or in an office setting, each of which presents unique challenges. Initiation of MAT in the appropriate setting, based on accurate assessment of gestational age, is a centrally important component of care for perinatal OUD. However, initiating treatment may present challenges to providers who lack experience treating this disorder. Vermont and New Hampshire are predominantly rural states which have focused on expanding MAT access for pregnant women using two different approaches to integrating treatment with maternity care.

Does co-location of medication assisted treatment and prenatal care for women with opioid use disorder increase pregnancy planning, length of interpregnancy interval, and postpartum contraceptive uptake?

INTRODUCTION: Women with opioid use disorder have higher rates of unplanned pregnancies, shorter interpregnancy intervals and lower rates of contraceptive use compared to women without substance use disorders. This contributes to worse perinatal and reproductive health outcomes for this population. It has been suggested that co-location of medication assisted treatment (MAT) and reproductive health services could allow for improved outcomes among women with substance use disorders. The aim of this study was to determine if location where women received MAT influenced their pregnancy planning, interpregnancy interval or uptake of postpartum contraception between subsequent pregnancies. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review at the University of Vermont Medical Center (UVMMC). Women were eligible for the study if they had two consecutive deliveries at UVMMC between 2009 and 2015 and if they received MAT during one or both pregnancies. Women in this community can receive MAT through a public MAT opioid treatment program (methadone or buprenorphine), a community MAT program (buprenorphine), or through an obstetric provider with co-location of prenatal care and MAT (buprenorphine). Demographics and maternal and neonatal outcomes were collected and descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: A total of 98 women were included in the study. Of the women with documented pregnancy intention status, 84% were unplanned, for both pregnancies. Over half of women had a short interpregnancy interval (56.1%), defined as <18 months between consecutive pregnancies. Half of women (50%) did not receive any contraceptive method in the postpartum period. Furthermore, many patients (42.2%) desired long acting reversible contraception (LARC), but only 9.3% received it. Outcomes were not statistically different among the models of care. DISCUSSION: Colocation of MAT with antenatal care did not improve pregnancy planning, interpregnancy interval, or uptake of postpartum contraception. Decisions regarding family planning and continued engagement with the health care system following pregnancy remain challenges in this group of women.

Opioid Detoxification During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with opioid detoxification during pregnancy. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from January 1, 1966, to September 1, 2016. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: English-language studies that reported outcomes associated with opioid detoxification among pregnant women with opioid use disorder were included. Nonoriginal research articles (case reports, editorials, reviews) and studies that failed to report outcomes for detoxification participants were excluded. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias and quality was assessed using the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force Quality of Evidence scale. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Of 1,315 unique abstracts identified, 15 met criteria for inclusion and included 1,997 participants, of whom 1,126 underwent detoxification. Study quality ranged from fair to poor as a result of the lack of a randomized control or comparison arm and high risk of bias across all studies. Only nine studies had a comparison arm. Detoxification completion (9-100%) and illicit drug relapse (0-100%) rates varied widely across studies depending on whether data from participants who did not complete detoxification or who were lost to follow-up were included in analyses. The reported rate of fetal loss was similar among women who did (14 [1.2%]) and did not undergo detoxification (17 [2.0%]). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence does not support detoxification as a recommended treatment intervention as a result of low detoxification completion rates, high rates of relapse, and limited data regarding the effect of detoxification on maternal and neonatal outcomes beyond delivery.

Using behavioral economic theory to increase use of effective contraceptives among opioid-maintained women at risk of unintended pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: An unsettling aspect of the US opioid epidemic is the high rate of in utero exposure, especially since most of these pregnancies are unintended, due in part to low rates of effective contraceptive use among opioid-using women. This study tested an intervention informed by behavioral economic theory and aimed at promoting effective contraceptive use among opioid-maintained women at risk of unintended pregnancy in the Burlington, VT, area between 2011 and 2013. METHODS: Thirty-one women were assigned (initial 5 consecutively, subsequent 26 randomly) to either usual care or an experimental intervention. Participants in usual care received condoms, a dose of emergency contraception, and referral to local providers. Participants in the experimental condition received usual care plus the World Health Organization's contraception initiation protocol, including free prescription contraceptives, and financial incentives for attending 13 follow-up visits over 6months to help manage side effects and other issues. RESULTS: Significantly more women in the experimental vs. usual care control conditions initiated prescription contraceptive use (100% vs. 29%) and reported prescription contraceptive use at 1-month (63% vs. 13%), 3-month (88% vs. 20%), and 6-month (94% vs. 13%) assessments. None of the experimental condition participants became pregnant during the 6-month protocol vs. three women (20%) in the control condition. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide the first experimental evidence supporting the efficacy of an intervention for increasing prescription contraceptive use among opioid-maintained women at risk of unintended pregnancy.

Methadone and buprenorphine for opioid dependence during pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare maternal characteristics, prenatal care, and newborn outcomes in a cohort of opioid-dependent pregnant women treated with methadone versus buprenorphine. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, 609 pregnant, opioid-dependent women were treated with methadone (n = 248) or buprenorphine (n = 361) between 2000 and 2012 at a single institution. RESULTS: Mothers treated with buprenorphine were more likely to start medication before or earlier in pregnancy, had longer gestation, and gave birth to larger infants. Newborns of buprenorphine- versus methadone-maintained mothers required treatment for neonatal abstinence significantly less often and for a shorter duration. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest pregnancy outcomes with buprenorphine to treat opioid dependence during pregnancy in clinical practice are as good and often better than outcomes with methadone. These results are consistent with efficacy data from randomized clinical trials and further support the use of buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid dependence during pregnancy.

Methadone safety: a clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society and College on Problems of Drug Dependence, in collaboration with the Heart Rhythm Society.

UNLABELLED: Methadone is used for the treatment of opioid addiction and for treatment of chronic pain. The safety of methadone has been called into question by data indicating a large increase in the number of methadone-associated overdose deaths in recent years that has occurred in parallel with a dramatic rise in the use of methadone for chronic pain. The American Pain Society and the College on Problems of Drug Dependence, in collaboration with the Heart Rhythm Society, commissioned an interdisciplinary expert panel to develop a clinical practice guideline on safer prescribing of methadone for treatment of opioid addiction and chronic pain. As part of the guideline development process, the American Pain Society commissioned a systematic review of various aspects related to safety of methadone. After a review of the available evidence, the expert panel concluded that measures can be taken to promote safer use of methadone. Specific recommendations include the need to educate and counsel patients on methadone safety, use of electrocardiography to identify persons at greater risk for methadone-associated arrhythmia, use of alternative opioids in patients at high risk of complications related to corrected electrocardiographic QTc interval prolongation, careful dose initiation and titration of methadone, and diligent monitoring and follow-up. Although these guidelines are based on a systematic review, the panel identified numerous research gaps, most recommendations were based on low-quality evidence, and no recommendations were based on high-quality evidence. PERSPECTIVE: This guideline, based on a systematic review of the evidence on methadone safety, provides recommendations developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel. Safe use of methadone requires clinical skills and knowledge in use of methadone to mitigate potential risks, including serious risks related to risk of overdose and cardiac arrhythmias.

Translating data to dialogue: how to discuss mode of delivery with your patient with twins.

OBJECTIVE: Patients are given options with regard to the mode of delivery with increasing frequency. The manner in which obstetricians frame the risk/benefit information can have dramatic impact on the ultimate decision made by the patient. STUDY DESIGN: Recently published epidemiologic data reported increased morbidity and mortality to the second twin on the basis of mode of delivery. In this analysis, the findings of the epidemiologic studies were translated from odds ratio into the number of cesarean deliveries that would be required to prevent an adverse outcome for the second twin. RESULTS: For gestations of > or = 36 weeks, 97 cesarean deliveries would need to be performed to prevent a single serious morbidity or mortality in a second twin. This number is within the range needed to prevent uterine rupture associated with trial of labor following cesarean delivery (556) or morbidity related to vaginal breech delivery (167). CONCLUSION: Number needed to treat may be more useful than odds risk assessment in patient counseling.